There is no good definition of probability. For frequentists, it requires an infinite number of independent events, i.e., it doesn’t exist in the real world. For Bayesians, it’s subjective, i.e., arbitrary and useless for science.
-
Rationality is not a particular set of beliefs. Rationality is a method for updating our beliefs when we get new information. The subjectivity in Bayesianism is nothing more than the fundamental uncertainty that can never be eliminated, only reduced
-
-
These are fundamental shortcomings that cannot be eliminated. Bayesians simply account for them. Objectivity doesn’t exist. The best we can do is rational subjectivity and approach objectivity in the limit
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.