Reason: Sanctions are not an effective deterrent. Russia has learned to live with them, even if it dislikes them. Its economy is much more resilient today to them - including in part due to help from China. Moreover, it has learned to expect sanctions no matter what it does
-
Näytä tämä ketju
-
Sanctions instituted this year for activity traditionally considered acceptable espionage - such as the SolarWinds/HolidayBear hacks - have undermined their use for deterrence as they send a signal that we will sanction Russia for everything it does
20 vastausta 109 uudelleentwiittausta 937 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
And while sanctions on oil and gas industry could be devastating to Russia economically but there is no prospect of them happening now - not with Europe freezing in the midst of a cold winter and inflation skyrocketing in US
8 vastausta 101 uudelleentwiittausta 697 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
Reason: Putin believes that his objectives are achievable with military force. The Russian military has overwhelming advantage in long range fires to easily overwhelm the Ukrainian forces within days and then push them back to the Dnieper river with infantry and armor
10 vastausta 87 uudelleentwiittausta 647 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
He is unlikely to invade Western Ukraine but can relatively easily split the country in half along the Dnieper and establish a permanent buffer zone between Europe and Russia, as well as a land bridge to Crimea
13 vastausta 101 uudelleentwiittausta 674 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
Reason: He likely believes the military cost will be low - either in initial invasion or its aftermath. Russia has decades of experience suppressing insurgencies - in Chechnya, Syria, Donbas and even Crimea
16 vastausta 73 uudelleentwiittausta 615 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
Western Ukraine would be a different story but that’s why he is not likely to cross the Dnieper. And, of course, Russia has successfully fought insurgencies in Ukraine multiple times throughout its history - 1640s, 1700s and 1920-1950s. Lots of experience there
11 vastausta 67 uudelleentwiittausta 618 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
Reason: Putin is almost 70. He knows he has about another decade in power at most. He views himself as a historical leader who has revitalized Russia economically and militarily after the devastating and humiliating 1990s
12 vastausta 88 uudelleentwiittausta 722 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
Recapturing Crimea in 2014 with relatively little cost likely emboldened him to solve other long-festering problems like reestablishing Russia’s sphere of influence in the near abroad before he leaves/dies in office. And now is as good of a time as any to do so
11 vastausta 91 uudelleentwiittausta 732 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
This is a very pessimistic but unfortunately also realistic outlook on why the invasion is highly likely. And there is likely little the West can do to stop it.
114 vastausta 147 uudelleentwiittausta 1 362 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju
Biggest reason of all: retaking Ukraine will do wonders for Putin’s popularity at home.
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.