Reality check: no one has ever built a quantum computer with qubits lasting more than a tiny fraction of a second, and quite possibly they never will.
-
It’s bizarre to me to double down on insisting there are no long lived qubits, but miss the obvious -valid- criticism that gate time to coherence time is a more relevant measure of computational capacity.
That's not what I said. Read my tweet. (Or perhaps you think that a qubit is a computer?)
-
-
It was a multi-qubit system. “Coupling” implies a multi-qubit system. The experiment itself implemented a complete set of gates and several quantum algorithms. You’re currently in a physics argument with a bunch of physicists. You’ve brought a spoon to a gunfight.
-
Do you have a peer-reviewed paper documenting your claims?
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.