Pedro Domingos

Read my tweet. I'm talking about a working computer, not an isolated qubit.

Sorry sir we perform quantum computations for chemistry using our system with 9s coherence times. So, incorrect.

That's not what the paper says.

The paper I cited above is the record of 1h coherence My lab performs quantum computations for chemical dynamics using 171Yb+ with 9s coherence times. Again, it's ok to be wrong, rather than trying to parse and reparse to make yourself feel like you were right.

You've provided no peer-reviewed evidence for your claim of a working quantum computer with long-lasting qubits. Stop trying to dodge the question.

Thank you for confirming that you have no peer-reviewed evidence of a working quantum computer with long-lasting qubits.