Find me an algorithm in a computer science textbook that needs regulated, and I'll make up some math that needs to be.
-
Okay, then I'm still trying to discern your specific point - which so far sounds very broad. How is it not, "If an algorithm defies an ethical standard it's the human deployers' fault, not the algorithm's"? Or is it, "Every sound/established correlation is fair game to act on"?
Neither. The ML algorithm's job is to model the world accurately. Then it's up to us what we do with it.
-
-
Sure - but when folks suggest regulating algorithms, they *mean* regulating how they’re used (acted upon, deployed). I don’t think there's a trend toward incriminating of an act of analysis in and of itself. It seems you’re attacking a straw man. What've I misunderstood?
-
Wake up, Eric. Tampering with algorithms is widespread. Read the GDPR, go to FAccT, look at what the "AI ethics" groups at tech companies are doing, etc.
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.