But what about the poor organizations that rely on the money they skim at every node of the redistribution web as it currently exists!!!
-
-
-
Not to mention all the government employees in charge of managing it.
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Near zero administrative cost, no disincentive to work, lots to like about it. We just have to make sure it's impossible to put conditions on it, later on, so it can't become a political club.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
I think a guaranteed minimum income or a negative income tax makes more sense than UBI
-
Negative income tax with no minimum wage is the way to go.
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Food for thought.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
No, we want it all.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
I love the idea in theory but here’s what actually happens: Left-Right: Deal! *8 hours later* (spongebob French guy voice) Left: okay but let’s include Just a little more for housing *1 year later* Left: and a little more for medical *1 more year* Left: and more for food! …..
-
Moral of the story: give mofos an inch and they take a mile. And they won’t do it all at once…they’ll do it *progressively*
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
They will never end other forms of redistribution; they gain more from that than UBI. Because they take a cut from the former via justifying the need for a bureaucracy and that will never rival what the latter can provide.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.