The poor are poor because they're unproductive, not because they're exploited.
Näytä tämä ketju
-
But the fundamental flaw in this argument. to 'produce' you need tools. The poor don't get those tools. It could be education. It could be nutrition. It could be the ability to sleep in a safe environment. Some of us who 'produce' have been given all the tools we needed.
So you agree with me. The key point is that we need to help the poor become more productive, not combat imaginary exploitation.
-
-
1/ You made a pretty big mental jump there. Yes, I do agree we need to improve education and the environment for people with less resources. I personally feel there is not a lot of business exploitation, but far more political exploitation. An example would be funding...
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
2/ for public schools being done on a country basis vs being done for a whole state. Rich counties have more resources and keep their kids educated, while poor counties fall further behind. Exploitation. Political more than corporate. But explotation none the less.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.