All mathematics is produced by physical objects (brains, computers). Therefore the laws of physics determine what theorems are possible, and mathematics has no existence independent of our universe.
-
“and mathematics has no existence independent of our universe.” —This is unverifiable. It does not follow, and cannot follow, from any of your premises or subsidiary conclusions.
-
-
Inapplicable to metaphysics. No reason to think Occam’s razor is more likely to apply than not.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
You’ve referred to Occam’s razor several times now. What do you think that adds as an argument? That fewer assumptions about an explanation make the explanation more likely to be true says exactly nothing about whether the explanation *is* true. The razor is just a rule of thumb.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.