Some people stubbornly cling to their propensity to teach, though.
The problem with universities is that faculty, students and administrators all care more about research prestige than quality of education.
-
-
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
I understand what you mean. However it's an unfair generalization..
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Students certainly don't care about research prestige. Brand name, bragging rights, employment prospects, an idea of elite education (whatever it is these days), maybe, research prestige? What even is that?
-
The point is that all of those are heavily influenced by research prestige.
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
That may be true at the top 100 or so research universities. At the rest they don’t care about either.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Universities were born to gather professionals and experts in a domain to discuss and advance in the frontier of knowledge. They already had a job. Nowadays, universities are seen as the catapult to a diploma and to a job by many people. Rigorously, this ain't its objective.
-
I'm someone in favor of having different institutions with different clear objectives: one being to advance the frontier of knowledge, and the other being to train good professionals.
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
They care more about in-group approval and prestige than true accomplishments and achievements.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
How does one distinguish research prestige from quality? Is there a non-social way to establish quality?
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Students? Kind of a bad take.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.