Canadian politicians are talking about setting up a Canadian DARPA. Tying precious research dollars to military applications is not an efficient way to innovate and will lead to obscenities like the self-healing minefield. Encourage start-ups, not the military industrial complex.
-
-
Vastauksena käyttäjälle @geoffreyhinton
I strongly disagree. DARPA is the most successful funder of computer science research in history. Defense applications are important in their own right, and the combination of fundamental research with a clear applied goal is a fantastic engine of progress.
7 vastausta 3 uudelleentwiittausta 72 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjälle @pmddomingos
Of course it was the most successful funder. It had by far the most money to spend. The question is would that taxpayer money have been better spent if it had not been required that every project have a military application. Are self-healing minefields a good use of money?
5 vastausta 5 uudelleentwiittausta 125 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjälle @geoffreyhinton
Not true - NSF has a bigger budget (and NIH even bigger). It's the funding model. Almost all research has civilian and military applications. And surely you don't think self-healing minefields are a more significant example of DARPA-funded research than the Internet.
2 vastausta 1 uudelleentwiittaus 9 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @pmddomingos ja @geoffreyhinton
You seem to be too much in favor of public spending for an anti-socialist guy.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä
Defense and research are precisely two of the appropriate functions of government, and DARPA combines both.
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.