They’re not agents of inequality, they just have unprecedented power to control and influence social narratives, to observe interpersonal conversations, and a demonstrated willingness to use those powers to achieve their social ends.
Far from being agents of inequality, tech companies are some of the greatest levelers in history. Rich and poor people alike use the same Google, Facebook and Amazon. Small businesses and individuals have access to far more opportunities online than they ever did offline.
-
-
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Access by lower-income people to markets -- goods, services, information -- both as buyers and sellers, is mind-bogglingly high. Many among the poor are unaware of the possibilities, though.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Totally agree- but what Richard said. With great power, comes great responsibility.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
The fact that these companies provide opportunities is not a valid argument against their monopolistic behaviors. The question is, what opportunities would be provided in a competitive market. Competitive not just across the predatory ad model.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
I wish you would stick to gradient descent. There are at least twelve nubby logically necessary conditions that you are missing in this analysis.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.