A better measure of academic impact would be number of citations minus 100 times number of publications. (Notice the minus - pubs are a cost.)
-
That would penalize exploration in favor of exploitation.
Important consideration, but not really. Successful exploration is what gets the most citations by far. (Also, think of the 100 as the epsilon in an epsilon-greedy policy, and choose a better value if needed.)
-
-
“Successful exploration is what gets the most citations by far” - yes, in the current system. I don’t think that assumption will hold once we switch to your proposed system.
-
No, it will happen more, because my metric strongly discourages incremental research (i.e., papers with less than 100 citations).
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.