There’s no such thing as universal ethics, because what’s best for an individual is not what’s best for the collective - both must compromise and transact with each other to make progress. And in doing so, both aim to deceive the other in that exchange.
If you think that your ethics is universal and immutable, the question is how to shoehorn AI into it. If you realize that ethics is a product of society, the question is how AI will change society and therefore ethics.
-
-
-
Any individual that denies this contradiction has either lost, or is playing the game of deception to advance their agenda. Each individual’s intrinsic goal is to out-compete every other in the game of genetic selection and proliferation. It drives all motivation and action.
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Actually, as "universal ethics" is so obviously a non-starter (other than in the blinkered perception of philosophy, religion and politics) I think there is an argument that AI is also a product of society, and therefore the question is how society will change both AI and ethics!
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Good angle to put the problem. Now you need to explain that to politicians
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.