How much agita and bloviation would we have avoided if in the 1950s we'd chosen Simon's label of "complex information processing" instead of McCarthy's "artificial intelligence?" A lot, IMOhttps://www.wsj.com/articles/why-artificial-intelligence-isnt-intelligent-11627704050?mod=hp_lead_pos6 …
How much of the best AI research would not have happened if it was vacuously called "complex information processing"? How many of the best researchers would not be in the field?
-
-
this is so true. I for one became interested in the field at college because of the term AI. It sparks the imagination.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
I can count on the fingers of the hand ( btw that meant that ENIAC would be a decimal, not binary, machine. Instead of a general- purpose central processor, it would carry out arithmetic operations in various separate units)
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.