Right, but overall frequency of extreme weather events can be substantially attributed to global warming no?
As a rule of thumb, the more extreme a weather event, the less likely you can ascribe it to climate change.
-
-
-
Not an expert
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Paradoxically, the more extreme the weather event the more likely it to be caused by climate change. Small shifts in the mean result in large shift on the extremes of an event distribution.
-
That's not how climate works. Climate is a nonlinear system of which CO2 is a very small part. Extremes are much more likely to be caused by natural variability.
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
I'm not sure that works as a pure fact of statistics. Assume you *cough* meet the basic assumptions of an iid sample *cough*, then isn't it the case that an extremely unlikely event under condition A is very much more likely under condition B that shifts the mean. (?)
-
It's not statistics, it's climate physics.
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Without a link to a scientific paper your words are just baseless claims.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
I’d love to hear your argument for this? Not sure your bold statement has won me over.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
I think with aspect to holecene period, it should be described as climate change, as it affect biodiversity very much.this biodiversity came because of the holecene period's characteristics.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.