Ha. I've been thinking like an economist all along, and if you discount the anti-CO2 hysteria, you'll come to the same conclusions I have. The problem is the hysterics that don't know Econ 101, and the economists that don't speak up against their antics.
-
I’d I agree with the market if it included all relevant externalities. I think that is your position too. I think we have different views on the externalities. And while I agree that experts can be wrong, I would double check my analysis if they overwhelmingly disagreed with me
I have, and they don't (that's the impression you get if you read the media instead of talk to the actual experts; again, reading "Unsettled" should be a real eye-opener).
-
-
The IPCC was created in large part so non-experts like you and me would know what the relevant experts agreed on and where the disagreements are. I find that very useful.
-
And thanks for the pointer to "Unsettled". I've often encountered smart people, esp. physicists, who disagree with domain experts outside their main field. They occasionally raise interesting points but my experiences is pretty mixed. I'll take a look.
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.