Rather than scour the world in search of a perfect human or deluding ourselves into thinking someone we like is perfect, it's better to design systems that take into account the fact that nobody is perfect. This is why only fools think concentrating power is a good idea.
-
-
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
I assume everything is fiction, except tax demands.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
its been done in STEM fields successfully for a long time. clearly more gain there than loss. so when we have other domains where the failure mode risk is apocalyptic (democracy collapse, climate collapse) it is worth considering applying it there too
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
‘Fact check’ complex A real example:https://twitter.com/Jav_Martin/status/1398287516306968577 …
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Because it’s never about the truth or falsehood of facts at all - anyone remotely interested in misinformation is actually interested in the narrative or agenda that each factoid promotes or suppresses. If you elect an arbiter, what would be their preferred agenda for deciding?
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Various regimes and special interests around the world will *never* agree on common definitions for conspiracy theories disinformation hate speech misinformation racist speech etc. One would have to be exceptionally naive to think this is possible.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Right, there is no single arbiter. We all have a responsibility to prevent misinformation from being amplified when we see it, whether we’re private individuals or private corporations
-
Not only that, there's a big agency problem here.
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.