New review paper says the greenhouse effect of CO2 is probably insignificant. https://hgss.copernicus.org/articles/12/97/2021/ …pic.twitter.com/I8X9HHu9hs
-
have always trusted the consensus on this subject, will continue to do so, but I would like to know more about this paper. From the abstract, this is a much bigger challenge to AGW than saying the "models are wrong" - they are claiming that temp => CO2?
-
-
thank you - just bought
-
my beliefs going into this are basically believing in AGW out of the precautionary principle, but a relatively low faith in climate model accuracy. i'd like to challenge either one of those tenets - maybe the models are better than I think
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Thank you
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.