Could we at least categorize the arenas of fairness to see if there are areas of less polarity?
Since different measures of fairness are incompatible, you can always find one by which AI systems are biased.
-
-
-
No. It's a multi-dimensional spectrum from completely personally selfishness regarding a physical microresource to godlike judgment in respect of infinite conceptual issues.
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
That's a fair statement.
-
It's not a statement; it's an observation.
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Yes, and that's why we need discussion, disagreement and debate more than ever!
-
Yeah, how else would academics be able to waste their (and everybody else's) time with pointless rhetoric - and *still* get paid for it...
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
"he Princeton computer scientist Arvind Narayanan has identified more than 21 different algorithmically incompatible definitions of fairness."https://reason.com/2019/01/01/what-if-the-algorithms-are-rac/ …
-
"A direct implication of this simple expression is that when the recidivism prevalence differs between two groups, a test-fair score Sc cannot have equal false positive and negative rates across those groups." https://arxiv.org/pdf/1610.07524.pdf …
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
same with football referees
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.