They are too big too fail standard economic model
Dirty little secret: Google's and Facebook's targeting algorithms are not all that great. If they were, their revenue per user wouldn't be so minuscule.
-
-
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
They are probably just using a logistic regression.
-
Good enough?
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
If they were more accurate they would make less money. They are tuned for inefficiency so advertisers soend more. That’s the reason. Has mothing to do w ARPU.
-
You think so? If the ads were more effective then Google/Facebook could demand higher CPMs (or equivalent) and ultimately make more money.
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
makes sense to me. Little boi Zuckerberg cant even speak for himself, hes always seeing what the lawyer is trying to spew to him. social-media-edaddy
@jack knows where it is at ;|@TwitterGov @TwitterVideo@TwitterSpacesKiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Absolutely true as an advertiser the segment they say they are delivering to you is far off from reality. LinkedIn is also way off
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
You tube is great. Facebook, not so sure.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
They are targeting every person even though their algorithm is not good at all. Can't imagine the situation when they will such algorithms.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
By what metric is it minuscule? FB gets over $7 a year with people paying through their eyeballs... a uniquely anemic method of payment.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.