Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
Also: you're the one who chose to cite Lissack in your piece, despite the fact that he has been harassing Timnit and I on Twitter and that his premise seems to be that it is unscientific to leave it as unspoken that white supremacy is bad. So yeah, I'm not gonna let that slide.
This is how cancel culture works: if someone writes a thoughtful critique of your pseudo-scientific paper, hurl insults at them, then call them the harassers and use that as a justification to not cite their critique. (And don't forget to throw "white supremacy" into the mix.)
Sorry we only unroll consecutive tweets from the same author, but if you want to grab the whole convo try @pdfmakerapp! https://twitter.com/pdfmakerapp/status/1290759123944894465 … 
https://twitter.com/haruno07/status/1290757755544821760 …Hello, we have captured the page for posterity: https://threadreaderapp.com/pdfs/dENRw7a5Z . Share it only with your closest friends ;)
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
![Screen cap of part of sec 4.4 of the paper, reading: "When we rely on ever larger datasets we risk incurring documentation debt, i.e. putting ourselves in a situation where the datasets are both undocumented and too large to document post hoc. While documentation allows for potential accountability [13, 52, 86], undocumented training data perpetuates harm without recourse. Without documentation, one cannot try to understand training data characteristics in order to mitigate some of these attested issues or even unknown ones. The solution, we propose, is to budget for"](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EshpGqXVcAAktqL.png)
