Very convenient characterization if you don't like the conclusions of the research
The paper by @timnitGebru et al that led to her resignation is advocacy disguised as research, says philosopher of science @LissackMichael in this devastating critique:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/348474721_The_Slodderwetenschap_Sloppy_Science_of_Stochastic_Parrots_-A_Plea_for_Science_to_NOT_take_the_Route_Advocated_by_Gebru_and_Bender …
-
-
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
So, are we still pretending she resigned then?
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
awww, you haven't been getting the 'bad attention' that you thrive on lately, huh little guy?
-
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
What are his credentials as a philosopher of science? Wikipedia describes him as "an American business executive, author, business consultant and director of the Institute for the Study of Coherence and Emergence." He also appears to have no phil. publications
-
I would comment on his article but it doesn't appear to be publicly available.
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
That you spend so much time undermining the contributions of Black women online is pathetic.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.