This is what @pmddomingos is busy retweeting today. Yes there really is no bias. We’re imagining these things as “deranged activists.” Whatever happened at the Capitol was just my silly nightmares and the harassment at work and conferences like @NeurIPSConf totally in my head.https://twitter.com/NAChristakis/status/1346994745973886982 …
If you disagree with the study, why don’t you address the evidence in it?
-
-
If you guys hold a peaceful and respectable debate on another platform, so many people would love to see it
-
I'm up for it, but to be honest I don't know if it's still possible with someone like Timnit.
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
How could anybody debate you after the racist tweets, attacks and trolling you have done to several activist women. One cannot debate a man with a hammer in his hand.
@timnitGebru has already tried to reason with you and just keeps getting attacked so why bother.Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
I feel an open mind about how prejudice is subjective helps to move the conversation forward To be clear, the fact that prejudice is subjective doesn't mean it doesn't exist Simply that proving it objectively is extremely difficult, as the counterfactual is near impossible
-
Think about what prejudice means: You're not trying to show that someone did something; you're trying to show WHY they did it (i.e. due to race, gender...) Then there are the correlational variables (which are hard to pinpoint as causation), like socioeconomic & societal norms
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.