As you know, Timnit's paper was not censored - it would be published either way - and she was not fired. Rather, if you trash your company's efforts in your area and threaten to resign, you shouldn't be surprised if they let you.
-
-
Professor, have you read the paper? Has the paper been in you hand and/or presented you? How can you be so sure that the paper is flawed? Based on what knowledge? Only the certainty that Google can't possibly have a reason to call that paper is flawed? Wow
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
-
Pedro's moral reasoning ability is deeply compromised, as evidenced by the causes he chooses to champion:https://twitter.com/pmddomingos/status/1158823037841620993?s=20 …
Keskustelun loppu
-
-
-
Pedro, What're you talking about?
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Kind of like how your university didn’t want their name to be associated with you after you started ranting about cancel culture and NeurIPS? At least she was doing actual research instead of wasting her time on a Twitter echo chamber.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
1. "There are answers to the problems you brought up" is feedback, not finding flaw 2. It's absolutely not "serious flaws" & nothing they pointed out matches that 3. CA law doesn't allow "you mentioned resignation ergo our abrupt termination ≠ firing" 4. Stop.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Say whaaat?
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
A retired tenured professor with zero accountability walks into a bar...
-
Someone who is immune to bullying, you mean?
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
!