Anima, the NIPS name change was a terrible idea, and the community properly rejected it. What's sad is that in the end you still managed to get the acronym changed to the current clunky, confusion-promoting one.
-
-
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
-
I would rather pronounce something hypothetically unpronounceable (its not actually!) than use a misleading and shameful term. Some people just cannot let go of their pride & ego. They just keep digging the hole they are already in, even deeper, trying to justify their stupidity.
Keskustelun loppu
-
-
-
I have no trouble at all remembering Neurips, nor does any other Brazilian I know.
-
Presumably because you never referred to it as NIPS before.
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
-
Awesome. This discussion is already a flying circus.
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
I'm a non-native English speaker: I don't think it's harder to pronounce/write/remember. (1/2)
-
As far as different-acronym is concerned: the conference name is still the same, isn't it? Still if someone doesn't know about the name change, a quick look at, say, a specific paper would show the same conference name printed at the bottom. Not that hard to figure out? (2/2)
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
And CVPR, ICML, ICCV, AAAI, SIGKDD, IJCAI, IJCNN, and ECMLPKDD all just roll off the tongue!

-
Notice that all of those are proper acronyms, unlike NeurIPS, with four letters from the first word.
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.