It's alarming that NeurIPS papers are being rejected based on "ethics reviews". How do we guard against ideological biases in such reviews? Since when are scientific conferences in the business of policing the perceived ethics of technical papers?
-
-
... you think we don't use machine learning in biology? It's a perfectly valid observation to find other fields are desperately behind on some protocols.
-
Wait wait, do you agree that ML and biology are different fields? May be his will make it clearer: math and bio are different, but you use math in biology.
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Different fields indeed, but both profoundly impactful on large swaths of the human population. Isn't that even more reason for ethics reviews? Not sure why I'm even writing this, you've made your mind and nothing will change it, but here we are.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.