It's alarming that NeurIPS papers are being rejected based on "ethics reviews". How do we guard against ideological biases in such reviews? Since when are scientific conferences in the business of policing the perceived ethics of technical papers?
-
-
Could you elaborate whats wrong with my thinking and right with yours?
-
Thanks for the thoughtful nonjudgmental response

Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
oh dear oh dear - not a particularly winning argument there. If it's 'wrong' please explain why it is, so that there is debate and an advancement of knowledge and understanding.
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Society is becoming supersensitive. It's just showing up everywhere in sport, science, in the way we are writing, in the way we express.
-
So, I guess it is time to become more transparent?! Rather than longing for yesterday, embrace tomorrow. Society changes, so should science.
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.