Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
It's literally the first sentence.
It says it's an argument, and you say it's not. Also, "often viewed as" is very different from "is".
The *vast* majority of the article is about logical fallacy. There's one section about non-fallacious arguments and you do not meet the criteria laid out.pic.twitter.com/7pVAQTwf0d
They’re baiting you into a word game. They’re trying to make it look like you made a mistake in what you communicated but we know what you meant. Don’t fall for it @BlancheMinerva and waste your time!
How on earth are you a professor?
Good lord. Reading for comprehension? The point is, you are waving around "slippery slope" as if it made some kind of point. It doesn't. Many natural and intellectual concepts exist on a continuum. We're professional thinkers and have had tools to deal with this for 100s of years
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
