Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
Have you actually read the ACM code of ethics? It is not restricted to PII and consent. I would like to be charitable, but the only explanations I can come up with for this response is either that you have no idea what's in the ACM code of ethics or you are lying about it.
I'm just addressing your specific examples. Have you actually read the NeurIPS ethics review guidelines, and compared them with the ACM code of ethics? And do other computer science conferences have the NeurIPS requirements of ethics sections and ethics reviews?
No, you are not addressing specific examples. You are cherrypicking them. The statement was "people whose PII is exposed, whose data is being used without consent, or who could be hurt by publication have less power than researchers."
And yes, I have read the NeurIPS requirements. They cover almost exactly the same things as the ACM ethics guidelines. I don't understand how you can think otherwise. Can you provide an example sentence from NeurIPS that you don't think is in the same vein as the ACM code?
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
