It's ridiculous to say that (for example) every paper about speeding up gradient descent needs to have a discussion of the social implications of faster gradient descent. But that's what NeurIPS currently does. Dear NeurIPS Board, please end this insanity.
-
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
-
If you'd listen to any of the ppl actually involved in the ethical review, I'm sure you'd know that a paper on faster SGD is not going to face any objections.
-
-
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
-
Yep, we literally did this: https://papers.nips.cc/paper/2020/file/4dd9cec1c21bc54eecb53786a2c5fa09-Paper.pdf … It took us a minute.
Keskustelun loppu
-
-
-
To make sure ppl have at least considered the potential impact. Did you read the instructions?
-
I.e., to force them to waste their time writing a section that makes no sense for their paper.
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.