Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
Nature: https://www.nature.com/nature-research/editorial-policies/ethics-and-biosecurity … Medicine: https://sites.jamanetwork.com/research-ethics/ … Biology: https://plos.org/resource/understanding-scientific-and-research-ethics/ … Biology: https://www.cell.com/heliyon/ethics Sociology: https://www.asanet.org/about/governance-and-leadership/code-ethics … Chemistry: https://pubs.acs.org/userimages/ContentEditor/1218054468605/ethics.pdf …
These do not require ethics sections or ethics review for most papers (and they're very few, and very different from computer science conferences).
If you follow the links, you'll see that every single one of them has stated ethical standards and many require ethical review of research pre-publication. These are all top journals. How many links would stop you from dismissing this as "very few"? 10? 100?
If the field of computer science believes itself to be exempt from ethics concerns in research, then it’s time for that to change. If anything, computer science research has the potential these days to be more negatively impactful than many other fields.
Science is about sharing objective information, not about hiding it because it could be used badly.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
