It's ridiculous to say that (for example) every paper about speeding up gradient descent needs to have a discussion of the social implications of faster gradient descent. But that's what NeurIPS currently does. Dear NeurIPS Board, please end this insanity.
-
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
-
Yes you can, and Pedro should know it full well. I think this is getting a bit awkward.
The only exception the NeurIPS ethical review guidelines carve out is pure theory papers. Does not cover the great majority of the topics included in the conference.
-
-
If you'd listen to any of the ppl actually involved in the ethical review, I'm sure you'd know that a paper on faster SGD is not going to face any objections.
-
So why do you have to write a section on its social impacts?
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.