Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
Leaving aside that we’re talking about minimal standards, “there’s more disagreement” would be an argument for, at best, more permissive ethical review, not none at all.
We're talking about far more than minimal standards (read the guidelines). And disagreement is an argument for leaving ethical judgments to the readers, not the reviewers.
Not really: publishing is an act, and as such subject to moral evaluation. It’s a thing people do, not something that happens in some abstract realm.
Moral evaluation and rejection by a program committee are very different things.
Surely a journal carries authority, and that authority could imply ethical approval to at least some who read it, conscious or not
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
