The problem here is that folks like him lack the humility to admit that they do not have skills in qualitative work and dismiss it all as a “slippery slope”. Qualitative methods have rigor. Ethical assessment can be generalizable and sustainable.https://twitter.com/pmddomingos/status/1336187141366317056 …
-
-
Vastauksena käyttäjälle @ruchowdh
No, what I'm saying is that if your notions of ethics and mine are different, I don't want you making ethical decisions on my behalf. You can be very rigorous, generalizable and sustainable, while also being wrong. (And please refrain from ad hominem attacks - they don't help.)
12 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 19 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @pmddomingos ja @ruchowdh
As with other disciplines, ethics does have an interdisciplinary history that has established itself and its standards through research. Your ethics may be different but that does not make them ipso facto correct and defensible simply because they are yours.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä
Of course not. The point is precisely that, because ethical beliefs vary widely, your ethical decisions are yours to make, not the program committee's.
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.