Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
Medical conferences and journals have applied ethical review standards for a long time. So I guess the "since when" answer would be the 5th Century BC. "do no harm" #AIEthics
Medical conferences are the exception, not the rule, and for obvious reasons.
If computing systems have a similar potential to harm people, either at the individual and the systemic level, would you still reject an impact assessment? (btw I am not in favour of ethics review as I believe we need a fundamental rights impact assessment).
But that's for systems to be deployed. We're talking about research papers here.
They might have been the first but not the last Physics has ethical standards for research, which include clear statements on bias. https://www.aps.org/policy/statements/guidlinesethics.cfm … sadly many pieces of AI research have suffered from bias in either their data or interpretation.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
