Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
Only four papers out of thousands were rejected due to ethical reviews. I'd like to see what they were, but for all we know they may not be in what any of us would consider a gray area.
I'm not sure if you're aware of this, but the "slippery slope" isn't a type of argument at all. It's actually the name of a logical fallacy you have engaged in repeatedly in this thread:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slippery_slope …
Your statement is contradicted by the article you cite.
True. But giving people power to suppress research certainly is.
As is, not having ethics reviews. What isn't?
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
