Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
I'm so genuinely taken aback by the confusion between "harm" and "ideology"? Is it a political position to vet a car for functioning breaks as not to kill people?
It's unacceptable to reject a paper on better car brakes because you don't like the social implications of drivers going faster.
Hm, don't think you quite understood my analogy. Let me rephrase: What is political about not doing research that, as part of its methodology, makes ppl sick or puts their lives at risk, without their consent? Safety & harm can be separate from ideology. Esp when data is involved
Exactly, and this is ethics 101, covered at the very start of ACM'S code of ethicshttps://www.twitter.com/WWRob/status/1336868247359037440 …
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
