Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
How is our field an exception given well-known applications that affect people's lives and freedoms like predictive policing, person re-identification that can be used in surveillance states, etc?
We already have computer science-wide ethical standards, set by ACM and others. It's not clear we need special ones for AI. Also, standards for research and standards for deployed applications are very different things.
ACM code of ethics: https://www.acm.org/code-of-ethics how many of these, especially points 1.2 (avoid harm), 1.4 (take action not do discriminate), and 1.6 (respect privacy) are consistently respected in ML research or application? Especially in the areas I mentioned like person reID
What are the consequences of breaking this code, given that many practitioners and some portion of researchers are not ACM members anyway? Should the principles of this code not be enforced in paper review?
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
