It's alarming that NeurIPS papers are being rejected based on "ethics reviews". How do we guard against ideological biases in such reviews? Since when are scientific conferences in the business of policing the perceived ethics of technical papers?
-
-
Due to regulatory processes that have been put in place partly due to experiments such as those. No such regulatory processes yet exist for machine learning research.
-
Who says they're needed? And who decides?
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Ethics and legality are not the same. This is why IRB exists, for example.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.