Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
What’ve been some of the rejected papers?
https://neuripsconf.medium.com/what-we-learned-from-neurips-2020-reviewing-process-e24549eea38f … For a little more context: Out of all submissions only thirteen apparently received ethics reviews and only four were rejected according to this. This just seems to formalize something that has always been done in reviews.
hard to say whether the greater sign of decline is the mandatory knee-bending in "broader impacts" sections, or presenting data like this:pic.twitter.com/M426pQAMKO
Also it's a stupid kind of rejection. It is possible for the authors to upload the papers somewhere else. Since the only reason they don't pass review is ethical (and the papers are high quality), we must treat them as if they did pass review.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
