A long article by @overbye on AI and fundamental physics. It features the new @nsf AI institute in fundamental physics. It’s an fascinating topic that I’ve wrestled with personally, and my thoughts are more nuanced than I can squeeze into a pithy quote
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/23/science/artificial-intelligence-ai-physics-theory.html …
-
-
Maybe a better question is: If Newton, Einstein, etc. had computers, would they have formulated the laws of physics differently? My guess is yes, and it's time for us to do it.
3 vastausta 3 uudelleentwiittausta 13 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @pmddomingos, @KyleCranmer ja
Many of the greatest scientific theories, like general relativity, were not data-driven, and are way beyond reach of present-day computing and AI. It's unclear how much today's computers would be an asset in the formation of such elegant and deeply creative ideas.
3 vastausta 6 uudelleentwiittausta 44 tykkäystä
They were driven by data via phenomenological laws, as well as by simplicity and consistency. They were constructed by symbolic manipulation and search. Computers can do all of that.
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.