Pugh's law: If the human brain is so simple that we can understand it, we would be so simple that we can not. [Probably equally fallacious ;-)]
Dyson's law: If AI systems were simple enough to be understandable, they'd be too simple to be intelligent.
-
-
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Good reason not to use them for important decisions. Accountability is impossible without legibility.
-
How is it that humans can be accountable then? Can you read their minds? Obviously something different and subtle is going on.
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Intelligence in humans is something that can reconcile the unbelievable with logic and the illogical with belief.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Clever, specious & wrong. The statement essentially says intelligence will forever be a mystery - that’s how it is defined - always beyond what we understand. People have thought that about so many phenomena which later were demystified by science.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
A rephrasing of Arthur C. Clarke's statement: "any advanced enough technology cannot be discern from magic"
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Intelligence is just a fraction of our mental processes and widely accessible to research. If we cannot decrypt its mechanisms, we are less intelligent than we imagined
-
Question? Can creation(independent artificially intelligent machines) be smarter than creator ever? Your take on this?
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Bonini’s Paradox: As a model of a complex system becomes more complete, it becomes less understandable.
-
What about emergence?
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.