Only issue with the article is that it uses the polling example. The national polls were right. Clinton won the popular vote. The state polls were off by a normal polling error, as @NateSilver538 pointed out before the election was possible.
"Less opinionated entrants falsify their preferences to not upset those who decide the rules, rewards, and punishments. Moderates will often support fringe positions for the sake of group solidarity and reputational preservation."https://quillette.com/2018/07/02/political-moderates-are-lying/ …
-
-
-
Infamously
@NateSilver538 also spent many months telling people it wasn’t possible for Trump to secure the GOP nomination. He hadn’t noticed the early poll which showed Trump was the •second• choice of the vast majority of Republicans—who all hated everyone else’s first choice.
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
it was great having you on twitter precisely because you offered up novel ideas. when you said something contentious that you ultimately changed your mind about, the response was unkind and unforgiving. this is a failing of twitter and modern public discourse. we hope you return
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
@MeganTesch v good readKiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
hey
@SamHarrisOrg This is similar to your argument against religious moderates. You might find it of interest. Perhaps invite the authors to the podcast.@vincentharinam@robkhenderson -
Also,
@ConceptualJames@MsMelChen@LaloDagach@sapinker@cultofdusty you might find this article of interest.
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Unfortunately "political moderates" define election outcomes
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
Näytä lisää vastauksia, myös mahdollisesti häiritsevää aineistoa sisältäviä
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.