holistic approach vs solely reading a static (which doesn’t include unreported crime). I am not a robot. 2/2
-
-
Replying to @msliberal3 @the_watcher and
thats the problem, you want to solve things unscientifically and uncritically. you think your feelings override reality.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @plscallmekimi @msliberal3 and
we need real solutions not touchy feely stuff.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @plscallmekimi @the_watcher and
Thanks for dismissing me. I’ve read how you “feel” when people dismiss you.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @msliberal3 @the_watcher and
thinking you're wrong is not dismissing your feelings. its pointing out that feelings are not scientific and should not be the basis for any criminal justice policies.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @plscallmekimi @msliberal3 and
if you actually had empathy like you claim then you'd have empathy for the millions being negatively impacted by the broken criminal justice system in america.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @plscallmekimi @the_watcher and
how do you know that I do not? you make a lot of assumptions and then expect me to defend what you assume of me.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @msliberal3 @the_watcher and
because you think the DA protects people from crime for one. which implies that you think the carceral system works.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
-
Replying to @msliberal3 @the_watcher and
No... not an assumption. It is based entirely off what you have claimed to believe. "He (the DA) isn’t doing his job to make anyone safe in SF" you literally think the DA's job is to make people safe. these are not assumptions these are the facts as I know them.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
do you believe anything at all?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
