You wanted him to be in prison before he committed a crime, do you not see a logical error here?
The parole board by itself, without the authority of the DA, can revoke parole, they could have sent him back to prison for up to half a year.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
They were notified.
End of conversation
-
-
-
Honestly, if he had been charged it probably makes no difference, they were liable to release him as a non-violent felon. The parole board however can actually send him to prison w/ a lower burden of proof, evidence he committed a crime, doesnt need conviction or filled charges.
-
I must have snoozed on something. I’m vaguely familiar with prop 49, but since when exactly is armed robbery considered non violent?
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
