We know for a fact that some of the "facts" relied on by the "fact" checkers are factually inaccurate and relevant facts have been omitted from the "fact" check. Fact checking, like psychological warfare, cuts both ways. Let courts find facts.
Conversation
Replying to
Reuters can’t be trusted as a fact checking source they are not impartial you only have to look at their board of directors and see where else they sit! Talk about conflict of interest!
4
8
53
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
Show replies
