here's a clip taken from youtube of steven crowder, who @TeamYouTube have said does not violate their policies. youtube are apparently happy to have this material on their websitepic.twitter.com/NsIDtHAwCE
If Crowder did a bit about "lispy queers" generally I would have a similar reaction to the clip above. It's gross, not funny, but not bannable. When you start targeting individuals with specific harassment, it's very different to me (whether I like the targeted person or not)
-
-
It's certainly different, but they're both against Youtube's (stated) rules for good reason. The "general" mockery of minorities encourages direct harassment against anyone in the targeted groups—and itself functions as harassment of a different kind.
-
The difference between "general" bigotry and "targeted" harassment is the difference between walking on a floor of nails and having nailguns fired at you. The former serves as a passive, steady, environmental condemnation of your existence, regardless of whether it's "personal".
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.