You didn't do a lot of research. Nice try though.
-
-
Replying to @sweats_actual @RedBloodedGuy and
Dude stop lying, do not be a LAIR, if Youtube was a in the wrong with legal code, then these rightwing nutters be suing its ass off in SC.
4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @teg_jamshed @sweats_actual and
This has nothing to do with the Constitution other than there was a section of an act established to protect First Amendment rights from the federal government. Read Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act.https://www.eff.org/issues/cda230
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RedBloodedGuy @sweats_actual and
Pikachueevie Retweeted Sweats
That law protects YT's right to delete accounts and videos and doesn't support the tweet below at all.https://twitter.com/sweats_actual/status/1139892090547122176 …
Pikachueevie added,
Sweats @sweats_actualReplying to @teg_jamshed @RedBloodedGuy and 2 othersNothing says they can't, but once you start picking and choosing which content to allow you cease to be a platform and begin to be a publisher. Right now many social media sites argue they are platforms, not publishers, and are exempt from certain regulations. 1/22 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @pikachuevie @RedBloodedGuy and
Indeed, YT & Twitter can delete content ban accounts as they deem fit, they are not required to provide services to anyone they wish not to be associated with. thats the bottom line These screams need to stop, "conservatives" can start their own 'no rules' tumptube & trumptter
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @teg_jamshed @pikachuevie and
Clearly you do not understand the provisions or statutes of the law, son. If they are going to curate content willy nilly they can be open to lawsuits like a publisher. It’s not a matter of whether they can or cannot delete content.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RedBloodedGuy @pikachuevie and
They have been deleting accounts for a long time now, why have these nutters not knocked on SC's door then ?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @teg_jamshed @pikachuevie and
Just because they have gotten away with it this long does not set a precedent that grants them this authority.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RedBloodedGuy @pikachuevie and
What gem of a situation ! gotta hand it to you, only conservatives can have such self-paralyzing attitude
, coz the situation seems to work for Tech companies either way.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @teg_jamshed @pikachuevie and
Self-paralyzing? I suppose you haven’t been keeping up with the list of conveniently banned conservative personalities. But sure, as long as it’s on the opposing political side then you’re reveling in delight like a pig in shit. The black and brown shirts would be proud.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
LOL There it is, the inevitable nazi comparison. So apt, too, because the nazis were a private company people voluntarily chose to be subject to, and freely agreed to their terms, and were free to stop being subject to them any time they wanted. 
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.