Conversation

Have you studied the history of 2A? Try reading up on it. It was never intended to mean an individual’s right to bear arms - outside of a ‘well regulated militia’.

Quote Tweet

Kyle Kashuv

@KyleKashuv

Apr 2, 2018

So you don't bother to read federalist papers? Not your thing? twitter.com/piersmorgan/st

10:23 PM · Apr 2, 2018

Replying to

And it was written when firearms were single shot muskets

Replying to

You wish Piers... sorry you’re not American, but let’s think about this logically... you cannot and will not be able to strip all 300 million guns from legal gun owners, so what’s your plan? Oh by the way, I see London’s knife epidemic going well

Replying to

Piers. That was completely and toally debunked by SCOTUS in Heller. Please.

Replying to

Please elaborate Piers.....

Replying to

Please tell me you are not actually this daft....cant be...

Replying to

You’re loosing to

. Just stop already. You clearly do not know what you are talking about.

Replying to

Says the Englishman who has accessed arms Security and doesn’t want gun control he wants gun confiscation

Replying to

We have a 2a because you Brits were such twatty, abusive imperialists.

Replying to

Now you’re being dishonest or ignorant, Piers. Who do you suppose makes up a militia? Individual people. And “well regulated” does not mean controlled by the government; it means well organized. #2A is the individual’s right to bear arms. You should know better.

Replying to

Holy crap!!! YOU need to read it!!!! Worry about your own damn country!!!

Replying to

and

You got your hands full over there!!