Piers Morgan
Katie Pavlich
Good thing you aren't in England anymore where they regularly prosecute for slander @piersmorgan
Just as the 2nd Amendment shouldn't protect assault rifle devotees, so the 1st Amendment shouldn't protect vile bigots. #PhilRobertson
-
- View other replies
-
@KatiePavlich I'm actively worried that my presence in the UK is considered a hate crime.
-
-
So the 1st Amendment only applies to those you agree with? How is that freedom, Piers?
@piersmorgan - View other replies
-
@ElissaRoberson Hush now.@piersmorgan will decide what's best, and which parts of the constitution are good for you. - View other replies
-
Which is funny considering people in his own country don't like him for the privileges he took.....
@RepRepublic - View other replies
-
@ElissaRoberson I wonder where@piersmorgan's tweets are condemning radical Muslims and their use of weapons and treatment of homosexuals? - Show more
-
-
-
Ignorant “
@piersmorgan: 2nd Amendment shouldn't protect assault rifle devotees, 1st Amendment shouldn't protect vile bigots.#PhilRobertson” - View other replies
-
@MichaelBrownUSA get your facts right. He said nothing derogatory or vile.@glaad just having a hissy fit. Havent been in the news 4 awhile. -
.
@iceflow76 huh? I agree.@piersmorgan is ignorant thinking#1A doesn't protect vile speech. -
@MichaelBrownUSA sorry, I must've misread your statement
-
-
-
.
@piersmorgan I knew it was just a matter of time before you showed your hand. -
This has nothing to do with the 1st Amendment, Piers, you dolt. But what about this?
@SaintRPh@piersmorgan http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journalism/2013/12/19/gay-ae-stars-not-suspended-for-expressing-preference-for-man-ass … - View other replies
- Show more
-
-
-
.
@piersmorgan Dear schmuck, point of the 1st amendment is to protect unpopular & offensive speech. Popular speech doesn't need protection. - View other replies
- Show more
-
-
-
.
@piersmorgan Actually that's exactly what the First Amendment is for you cheeseheaded ponce. - View other replies
- Show more
-
-
-
- View other replies
-
@Popehat Do tell us,@piersmorgan; should the 1st amendment protect, say, newspaper editors who publish faked photos on the front page? - View other replies
-
@PencilBloke@Popehat@piersmorgan 1st should protect from prior restraint; may be libelous (Times v Sullivan), but asshats gonna be asshats -
@dbrower@Popehat And@piersmorgan calling for any protection to be removed from asshats is like a turkey calling for Christmas dinner.
-
Christine Rousselle
Elissa Roberson
Christie
Michael Brown
GaryM
Matt Dawson
Yes, Nick $earcy!
AG
Stephen Miller
Popehat
Rob
David Brower
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.